Good-bye TarzanDevaki Jain THE DESCENT OF WOMAN By Elaine Morgan Bantam Edition, 1973, Price Not Stated VOLUME I NUMBER 1 January - March 1976 ‘She was there all along, contributing half the genes to each
succeeding generation. Most of the books forget about her for most of the time.
They drag her on stage rather suddenly for the obligatory chapter on Sex and
Reproduction, and then say: 'All right, love, you can go now,' while they get
on with the real meaty stuff about the Mighty Hunter…’
In this vein Elaine Morgan, a graduate of Lady Margaret
Hall, Oxford, in English literature entertains, startles and informs the mind
throughout the 280 pages of this gripping book. She refers to learned books and
eats up their ideas and their evidence with her dogged determination to trace
the ancestry of the human race.
This is how she describes the story of human evolution as
it stands now. ‘Smack in the centre of it remains the Tarzan-like figure of the
prehominid male who came down from the trees, saw a grassland teeming with
game, picked up a weapon, and became a Mighty Hunter.’
There is something about this Tarzan figure which has them
all mesmerized.
From chapter to giddy dazzling chapter she proceeds to
develop her thesis that the Tarzanists are wrong. Our first move is not from
the trees to the plains, but from the trees to the water. From the Miocene
period where the weather was mild, heavy rainfall, flourishing forests and our
ancestor could have been a gibbon or a gorilla, researchers take us to the
Pliocene drought which lasted twelve million years. What happened to us along
the way? Elaine Morgan calls this the 64,000 $ question. ‘What happened to
them? Where did they go?’—to the water of course, led by
the female. In the next nine chapters she takes up questions usually discussed
by the evolution theorists, shakes them vigorously, drops all the loopholes
one by one. It is best to quote her endlessly as her style is inimitable.
‘Why did they stand upright?’ Robert Ardrey says, ‘We
learned to stand erect in the first place as a necessity of the hunting life’.
But she says,
‘ ... wait a minute. We were quadrupeds. These statements
imply that a quadruped suddenly discovered that he could move faster on two
legs than on four. Try to imagine any other quadruped discovering that—a cat? a dog? a horse? —and you'll see that it’s totally nonsensical. Other things
being equal, four legs are ... Table of Contents >> |