logo
  New Login   
image

Beyond the Mainstream


Anuradha Chenoy

WOMEN IN PEACE POLITICS
By Paula Banerjee
Sage Publications, New Delhi, 2008, pp. 323, Rs. 450.00

VOLUME XXXII NUMBER 10 October 2008

Women by their presence and agency have multiple roles in the various armed conflicts of South Asia. Their roles as combatants and peace makers awaken curiosity amongst onlookers and interest amongst researchers. Yet women and civil society actors remain outside this process to governments of South Asia who are supposedly looking for solutions. This edited collection brings together a set of concerns related to the peace aspect of women’s roles in conflict situations, and combines theoretical insights, empirical evidences, stories, pamphlets and poems around this chosen theme. Several of these essays have been published earlier but that does not detract from their relevance especially because as Rannabir Samaddar states at the outset: peace with justice has not been on the agenda of peace making in South Asia. Located in a feminist framework this bouquet for young women researchers brings back relevant theoretical insights of how feminists look at gender issues and the construction of masculinities and femininities during times of war and peace.   Cynthia Cockburn’s contribution on ‘Feminism as a Resource in Opposing Xenophobia’ theorizes on how not to think about identity by showing how it is constructed. This she argues calls for a special kind of political imagination, which can be constructed by imaging a political future when identity is provisional and not essential: ‘As contingent necessity, not as truth.’ Feminism can transcend such identity Cockburn believes and feminism is a critique of the politics of gender identity because ‘it perceives that different modes of gender differentiation are possible’.   Cockburn thus rejects the essentialist forms of feminism in favour of the collective form with a project for transformative change. She explains the construction of the ‘model’ or most acceptable identity of a citizen by the state (and by advertisers) that pressurizes us to be a particular ‘type’ that suits nationalism and the state.   Cockburn however states that all wars are about economic power and control. This is a somewhat economic deterministic and essentialist argument in an otherwise brilliant essay and actually contradicts her analysis on identity. The conflict in Kashmir for example is on account of an alienated community rather than economic power. Any amount of economic power and control is not likely to give the Kashmiri people solace after all the human rights abuses. Thus denial of rights is equally important as economic power and control. But aside from this, Cockburn’s essay makes for essential ...


Table of Contents >>
Please or to Read Entire Article
«BACK

Free Access Online 12 Back Issues
with 1 year's subscription
Archive (1976-2011)
under construction.