New Login   

Anti-Imperialist Analyses

Amiya Kumar Bagchi

Nicholas B. Dirks
Permanent Black, New Delhi, 2007, pp. xx 389, Rs. 650.00


Capitalism was born with the mark of Cain on its brow. From the voyages of Prince Henry the Navigator in Portugal to the piratical enterprises of Francis Drake and Jack Hawkins (in which the Virgin Queen of England held a share) to the burning of whole islands of the Indonesian archipelago by Jan Coen, the founder of the Dutch empire in the East, the gun of the killer even more than the false balances of the merchant was often the instrument of gain for the pioneering capitalist nations1 . When the shares in piratical enterprises were consolidated in the joint stock of a company, as in the case of the English East India Company (EEIC, from now) and the Dutch East India Company following on its heels, royal or republican charters allowed them the privileges of monopoly trade and empowered them to act as the advance guard of armed conquest in extra-European lands. Hugo Grotius’s code of international law stopped on the borders of Christian Europe. In the seventeenth century CE, the British learned from the Dutch in many areas, including the adage that war was an essential appendage of profit-making enterprise. When Josiah Child, Chairman of the EEIC and an avid student of European political economy, tried the same tactics during Aurangzeb’s time, he was soundly beaten. But the EEIC did not give up. Opportunities for seizing territorial control came up first in Southern India, but the great prize was the seizure of Bengal after the traitorously won victory in Plassey. The Company’s victory in India came after the consolidation of oligarchic rule in England in the eighteenth century. The EEIC also had a role to play in that consolidation and corruption played a signal part in its defeat of forces that sought to strip it of its monopoly privileges. The two books under review devote considerable attention to the intertwining of monopoly, empire and corruption in the rise of British rule in India. Dirks’s story starts with the conspiracy that led to the ignominy of Plassey, whereas Robins’s tale starts with the founding of the EEIC during the reign of Elizabeth I. Robins is an investment advisor whereas Dirks is a historian. Robins’s forte lies in laying out the financial details of bribes, stock-jobbing and gains for the various players. Dirks concentrates his attention on laying bare the networks through which the numerous ...

Table of Contents >>
Please or to Read Entire Article

Free Access Online 12 Back Issues
with 1 year's subscription
Archive (1976-2011)
under construction.