logo
  New Login   

History of a Revolt


Amar Farooqui

THE LAST MUGHAL: THE FALL OF A DYNASTY, DELHI, 1857
By William Dalrymple
Penguin/Viking, New Delhi,, 2006, pp. xxvii 578, Rs. 695.00

VOLUME XXXI NUMBER 3 March 2007

In the 150th anniversary year of the great revolt of 1857, William Dalrymple has stolen a march over professional historians (that is, historians who also happen to be academics, for, Dalrymple is in his own way a professional historian having been engaged for long in researching and writing on historical themes), by producing a major new study of the event. The Last Mughal is not so much a biography of Bahadurshah II, better known by his takhallus or pen-name ‘Zafar’, as a history of the revolt in Delhi. Nearly four-fifths of the volume deals with the background to the revolt, the revolt itself, and the terrible aftermath.   The book does set out all the relevant information on the personal life and public career of Zafar, though the focus is on the period from the mid-nineteenth century down to the final days of the last Mughal emperor. This is a well-told story, and Dalrymple manages to capture all the excitement and turmoil of the rebellion, as well as the desolation of Delhi after the British had recaptured the city. The real strength of the book is its portrayal of the everyday lives of various sections of the people of ‘independent Delhi’ during the hot summer months of 1857. Dalrymple has painstakingly put together some fascinating contemporary illustrations, among which the rare portrait of Zafar in his early twenties is a gem.   The publication of The Last Mughal has already managed to stir up quite a bit of controversy, partly due to Dalrymple’s claim that the originality of the work lay in its making extensive use of hitherto untapped sources, and partly because of his assertion that at least in so far as Delhi was concerned the revolt was regarded as an ‘Islamic jihad’ by a significant section of the participants—particularly those who articulated its ideology and/or coined its slogans. Dalrymple’s characterization of the revolt at Delhi in terms of a ‘jihad’ is supposedly based largely upon his interpretation of the voluminous Mutiny Papers housed in the National Archives of India (since Dalrymple has perhaps no Persian and little Urdu, a small fraction of these documents, most of which are written in the cursive shikasta hand, have been translated for the purpose of the book mainly by Mahmood Farooqui). This valuable source material, we are told, has scarcely been touched by historians of 1857, and the USP of The Last Mughal ...


Table of Contents >>
Please or to Read Entire Article
«BACK

Free Access Online 12 Back Issues
with 1 year's subscription
Archive (1976-2011)
under construction.