Muslim PoliticsShri Prakash MUSLIMS AND INDIAN NATLONALISM By Uma Kaura Manohar Books,New Delhi, 1977, Rs. 50.00 VOLUME III NUMBER 1 July/August 1978 This book is one among a
number of recent publications dealing with various aspects of the origin and
development of Muslim communal politics during the national movement. Many of
these—for example, Sheila Sen’s work on
Bengal, A.K. Gupta’s book on the N.W.F.P and Francis Robinson’s work on the
growth of Muslim separatism in the United Provinces—deal not only with specific periods but only with given regions. Since
Kaura sets out to explain ‘the emergence of the demand for India’s partition’
as such, one expects her to put forward a generalized conceptual framework that
can demonstrate the inevitability of the actual course of events rather than
merely record their details.
Before
launching into any discursive comments, one has to reconstruct from the
different chapters the author's explanation for the reasons that gave rise to
the demand for Pakistan. Kaura locates the genesis of Muslim communal politics
in the fact that, in contrast to Punjab and U.P., where Muslims in comparison
to their share in the population had a disproportionately large share of landed
property, facilities for education and government jobs, in Bengal, ‘they were
backward both economically and educationally.’ This fact was represented by
the Hunter Commission as an index of the general state of Indian Muslims, and
later used by the Muslim elite of U.P. ‘to wring concessions from the government’,
as well as to appeal for ‘their community to keep aloof from the Congress.’
Sir Syed’s vehement opposition to ‘the attempts at democratization by the
Congress’ was rooted in his social position as a member of the Muslim aristocracy
who wanted to ‘preserve their own privileged status as a minority.’
It
was only by the beginning of the twentieth century that ‘there was a growing
realization among the Muslims that they had to have a political realization of
their own.’ The social reasons for this are virtually impossible to make out
from Kaura’s book. She simply asserts that, in spite of ‘professed loyalty’ to
the British, and ‘their strong dislike for the Swadeshi movement’, the Muslims,
‘ever since the death of Sir Syed, were not as critical of the Congress as they
used to be before.’ Not only this, ‘the younger generation of Muslims had even
started thinking in terms of throwing in their lot with the ... Table of Contents >> |