Beyond Politics: A Layered AnalysisGunjan Singh TAMING TIBET: LANDSCAPE TRANSFORMATION AND THE GIFT OF CHINESE DEVELOPMENT By Emily T. Yeh Cambridge University Press, New Delhi, 2014, pp. 523, Rs. 695.00 VOLUME XXXIX NUMBER 3 March 2015 The People’s Republic of China (PRC) under the leadership of
Mao ‘liberated’ Tibet in 1951attempting to bring the region
under Communist rule. However, the promises made
by the PRC (of respecting the religious beliefs of Tibetans) were
disregarded and thus Tibet witnessed the first ‘uprising’ against Communist
rule in 1959. A large number of Tibetans with the Dalai
Lama fled to India in order to survive the Communist backlash.
Over time Tibet has witnessed a number of such ‘uprisings’ which
has disturbed the notion of control of the PRC over Tibet. The most
recent one was in March 2008 before the Beijing Olympics. The
Chinese Government is always looking for newer ways and means to
bring Tibet in its fold and get the people of Tibet to accept its rule
without defiance. However, the recent incidents of ‘self-immolations’
prove that the Tibetan people are resorting to new methods to convey
their anger and discontent with respect to the Chinese government
and army presence in Tibet. With this backdrop the book by
Emily Yeh is rightly titled as the primary aim of the Chinese government
is to ‘tame’ Tibet (both geographically and politically).
To discuss the ways and means which are employed by the PRC
to bring Tibetans into its fold, the Chinese Government has been
using the idea of ‘development’. The author states that the book is
about the production and transformation of the Tibetan landscape
from the 1950s to the present. The author argues that the Chinese
Government is using the ‘Comfortable Housing Program’ in order
to transform the Tibetan region and thus territorialize Tibet. The
idea of bringing a modern ‘look’ to the Tibetan landscape in addition
to transforming the landscape as per the ideas of the Chinese
Government is the primary tool employed by the PRC. She asserts
that, ‘the spectacle of development created by image engineering
marks both a “laudatory monologue” and a claim that the Chinese
state is the legitimate and benevolent care giver of this contentious
space of the Chinese nation’ (p. 251). By providing ‘development’
the Chinese government is attempting to gain the unquestioned loyalty
of the Tibetan people. By providing a modern household the
Chinese Government aims to control the notion of Tibetan loyalty
towards the Dalai Lama. This is further asserted with the authority
to search the houses as well as issuing government orders which forbid
Tibetans from using any symbol or idea ... Table of Contents >> |