Ethics of Liberal InterventionAli Ahmed TOPPLING GADDAFI: LIBYA AND THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL INTERVENTION By Christopher S. Chivvis Cambridge University Press, New Delhi, 2014, pp. 249, Rs. 495.00 VOLUME XXXIX NUMBER 4 April 2015 Christopher Chivvis is the quintessential
policy wonk having rotated in
and out of government and the
academia, so typical of the career profile of
public intellectuals in the United States.
Given that he needs the government for access
to information and the policy high table,
as much as the government needs his brains,
it is inevitable that he would write up a
favourable account of the US role in toppling
Gaddafi. Billeted in the RAND Corporation
that has over the decades provided the strategic
community in America grist for its incestuous
debates, he is as much an insider as
a bystander. Consequently, it is entirely understandable
that he concludes: ‘The results
are far from perfect and postwar stabilization
has faltered, but ultimately the choice
to intervene was the right one (p. 205).’
The book is an account of the events in
2011 in which the French and UK supported
by the US initially launched Operation
Odyssey Dawn to be followed soon thereafter
by the NATO’s Operation Unified Protector.
It covers the events leading up to the
intervention; the diplomacy that attended
the intervention; the military operations of
the NATO; and US policy choices during
the war. It makes the case that the regime’s
actions in Benghazi in early 2011 created
conditions for the intervention under the
framework of the new fangled concept of
Responsibility to Protect (R2P). As a slim
volume priced affordably, it has something
for everyone. But it is unlikely that readers in
the region will find in it much to agree with.
In particular, the author’s answer that
the intervention was right is rather glib. At
the time of writing of this review three years
after the intervention, primetime news has
it that Tripoli’s airport has been shut down
because of fighting between rival militia
groups in the vicinity. This cannot but be
attributed to the influx of weaponry and perfunctory
training given by Special Forces
troops to the tribal militias that sprung up
in wake of the intervention. It shows how
easy it is to engineer the conditions that can
then be used to legitimate premeditated
operations citing R2P. Similarly, regimes
were displaced in Afghanistan and Iraq and
there is a concerted move underway to displace
the one in Syria. The human cost in volved has been borne by the societies subject
to the ‘liberal’ attention of the West,
but more likely subject ... Table of Contents >> |