Maoism In Twenty-first Century IndiaAjay K. Mehra By P.V. Ramana Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi, 2014, pp. 398, Rs. 1101.00 COUNTERING NAXALISM WITH DEVELOPMENT: CHALLENGES OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND STATE SECURITY By Santosh Mehrotra Sage, New Delhi, 2014, pp. 189, Rs. 795.00 MAOISM, DEMOCRACY AND GLOBALISATION: CROSS CURRENTS IN INDIAN POLITICS By Ajay Gudavarthy Sage, New Delhi, 2014, pp. 243, Rs. 895.00 LEFT WING EXTREMISM AND HUMAN RIGHTS: THE ROLE OF CIVIL LIBERTIES GROUPS IN ANDHRA PRADESH By V. Thomas Sage, New Delhi, 2014, pp. 287, Rs. 995.00 VOLUME XXXIX NUMBER 7 July 2015 The four studies on the Maoist movement
in India under review here bring together different perspectives on the
enigmatic movement that has puzzled the Indian state from the 1940s (the
Telangana armed struggle) and more particularly since the Naxalbari uprising
in West Bengal in1966–67. In fact, analysing the Telangana movement in this
continuum is fair and gives an interesting perspective of an armed
Marxist-Leninist movement beginning in a region in the south during the British
rule governed by the Nizam of Hyderabad and continuing even after India is
partitioned and freed of the colonial yoke. The movement that successfully
checked the brutally repressive regime of the doras and the deshmukhs and tackled landlessness amongst the peasants was
withdrawn in 1951. The Indian state transitioning at that point of time from
the colonial to an independent nation, naturally used force, in both its format,
yet simultaneously creating moral pressure following the launch of the bhoodan (benefaction
of land) movement by Vinoba Bhave, which weakened the movement. Finally,
Stalin advised a visiting delegation of the Communist Party of India (CPI) in
1951 that the Party gave parliamentary democracy in India a chance; the first
general election was round the corner. Significantly, it emphasized the
importance of introducing a judicious redistribution of land in India and
bring to an end the exploitation of the marginalized by the deeply entrenched
structures of dominance. That it could afflict other States too became clear
in a decade and a half with the outbreak of the Naxalbari movment in West
Bengal and land, along with other common property resources, continued to
remain a central question in any part of the country the Maoist movement
surfaced. The Telangana movement is also significant because Andhra Pradesh
(Srikakulam) and Telangana became the centre of re-emergence of the Maoist
movement since 1969, the period when it was being crushed in West Bengal.
Transformed into a parliamentary party, the CPI faced an ideological
split in 1965 that moved a more radical section of the newly created
China-leaning Communist Party of India (Marxist) or the CPM to northern West
Bengal to transform the stirrings amongst the peasants there into a revolutionary
armed insurrection that came to be known as Naxalism after village Naxalbari
lit the spark in March 1967, is well-recorded. That the CPM too would split in
1969 as the CPM-in-power and ... Table of Contents >> |