![]() A Complicated QuestAnuradha Kapur THE THEATRE OF VEENAPANI CHAWLA: THEORY PRACTICE PERFORMANCE Edited by Shanta Gokhale Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2014, pp. 352, Rs. 895.00 VOLUME XXXIX NUMBER 10 October 2015 The Theatre of Veenapani Chawla: Theory Practice Performance is
a timely book in more ways than one. It is tragically timely
in that it appeared just a few months before Veenapani’s sudden
death shocked us all in late 2014. Veenapani Chawla’s practice
has, it seems to me, remained almost neglected.
Affecting because Veenapani was a dear friend and colleague whose
three decade long practice in the theatre sometimes corresponded
and sometimes entirely differed from the journeys of many of her
contemporaries, of whom I am one. Veenapani Chawla’s work brings
to the fore the many contradictions that have beset our generation.
The national and the international; the universal
and the particular; the cosmopolitan and the global
are in vexed relationships with each other and
have had to be described and navigated in our practice.
Exhilarating because it focuses our attention
on what is to my mind one of the most extraordinary
quests in contemporary Indian theatre practice.
Veenapani schooled herself in many grammars
and vocabularies. As Shanta Gokhale’s introduction
maps, she taught herself through arduous apprenticeship,
Kudiattam, Kalari Chau; trained her voice
with Patsy Rodenberg; followed leads, met people,
had gurus, was a disciple, and had disciples. It is a
complicated and strenuous journey which does not
always arrive at an answer; or acquire a comprehensive
lexicon. Even in terms of what it sees as its
quest there’s no accelerating path leading to a revelatory
point in the future. Quests also change, fade
and morph. They accommodate and respond to
moments in time and need not necessarily have what we call in theatre,
a through-line. In a brilliantly written foreword, Mahesh
Elkunchwar talks of oeuvre, of borrowings, of robbery. Robbery is an
acknowledgement of desire and focused need; we might rob as it
were, exactly what we require to make our work particularly our own;
without the burden of originality.
The book is rich because it has many voices and points of view.
It has essays written over time—by writers, critics, academics, talking
about Veenapani’s earliest works to her later explorations. In an
exchange of letters between Alaknanda Samarth and Veenapani we
read about tiny epiphanies embedded in the quotidian and the unremarkable.
It has interviews, especially one with Leela Gandhi,
Veenapani’s niece and a close reader of her work, which opens up
questions of teaching and learning, pedagogy and method. We come
... Table of Contents >> |