Adult Education: Participatory EvaluationA.K. Jalauddin ADULT EDUCATION FOR SOCIAL CHANGE: A STUDY OF THE NATIONAL ADULT EDUCATION PROGRAMME IN RAJASTHAN By T.V. Rao , Anil Bhatt., T.P. Rama Rao in collaboration with Deepti Dixit & D,S. Sarupria Manohar Publications, New Delhi, 1980, pp. vii 192, Rs. 60.00 VOLUME V NUMBER 2 September/October 1980 New trends in social science research indicate a major departure
in the assessment of the role of the researcher or the investigator. The
traditional role of the researcher as a detached and ‘neutral’ analyst, while
it proved suitable to a certain extent to describe the world as it exists,
hardly equipped him to work for changing it. It is through participation in the
sense of intervention that the researcher may learn the process through which a
change is brought about.
The general tendency to isolate the ‘content’ from the ‘process’
of change introduces the major distortions in the evaluation of any
socio-economic programme with disproportionate emphasis on growth in
comparison with equity. The participatory techniques in social science research
demand a re-examination of the relationship between the researcher and the
researched, the investigator and the investigated - put differently, the subject
and object of research. Very few social programmes in India offered scope to
social scientists and social science research institutes to develop the participatory
techniques of research. The National Adult Education Programme (N AEP) happens
to be a major programme encouraging participatory research.
Adult education programmes generally have had very low
credibility due to the low 'motivation of prospective learners and irregular
and indifferent functioning of adult education centres in the past. In the
background of this credibility gap, the allocation of Rs. 200 crores (Rs. 100
crores through the State sector and Rs. 100 crores through the Central sector)
for the implementation of NAEP created serious apprehensions in the minds of many
political leaders, administrators and media
men. The Central Government was, therefore, _ rightly advised not to go in for
rapid expansion of the adult education programme without ensuring proper
preparation and arrangements for monitoring and concurrent evaluation of the
programme. Besides entrusting the Directorate of Adult Education with the
responsibility of monitoring NAEP, several well-known social science research
institutes were identified by the Government for evaluation of the projects
undertaken by voluntary agencies.
The programme of external evaluation—more appropriately termed 'quick appraisal'—was initiated with the evaluative study conducted by the
Sardar Patel Institute of Economic and Social Studies, Ahmedabad, of the Adult
Education programmes run by voluntary agencies in Gujarat. The book under
review happens to be the report of the second study in a series of such studies
conducted by the ... Table of Contents >> |