Doctor's Role in DevelopmentAneeta Minocha DOCTORS AND SOCIETY: THREE ASIAN CASE STUDIES-INDIA, MALAYSIA, SRI LANKA Edited by T.N. Madan in collaboration with Paul Wiebe, Rahim Said and Malsiri Dias Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi, 1980, pp. 311, Rs. 75.00 VOLUME V NUMBER 2 September/October 1980 The book is an outcome of a project initiated
by UNESCO to undertake cross-cultural studies of doctors in the context of
development and modernization.
The role of professions particularly the medical
profession in the modernization of developing countries is a matter of
considerable interest to sociologists. It is also a challenging task given the
lack of agreement on what is to be understood by the terms modernization and
the role of professions in it. UNESCO should be congratulated for taking it up
as a theme on a cross cultural basis.
Many questions could be asked in this
connection: Medicine is an ancient profession devoted to removal of suffering
caused by disease. What new roles and tasks should it now be entrusted with to
play the role of modernization expected of it and other professions? What role,
if any, was played, and in what manner, by the medical profession in the
developed countries in their development and modernization; if such be the
terms used to characterize them? What should be the yardstick to assess the
modernizing role played by any profession? What should be considered the
relationship between modernization and development? To what extent professions
could be isolated from other features of the society in order to assess their
contribution? Clarity on these issues is necessary to give a perspective on
any study on this theme of professions and society. Only then a proper framework
of study can be evolved, which will in turn have a bearing on the conclusions
drawn. The book under consideration takes up only a few of these questions.
The project envisaged that the doctors in the
three countries be studied in the context of institutions of national importance.
Private practitioners were excluded from the purview of the study from the very
beginning, the reason given is that private medical practitioners’ ... are not
of the same importance as in affluent countries and, they cannot be expected to
answer the health care needs of the community in the same manner and magnitude
as institution-based doctors .... Health care institutions are expected not
only to provide free service but also to so organize the activities of their
personnel as to place public weal above the personal considerations of the
doctor’ (p. 6). The basis of these generalizations about private practitioners
and institutions is not given. No doubt there are clear advantages ... Table of Contents >> |