China: Politics of Civil War EraHarmala Kaur Gupta CIVIL WAR IN CHINA: THE POLITICAL STRUGGLE, 1945-1949 By Suzanne Pepper University of California Press, Berkeley, 1980, pp. xxi 472, $6.95 VOLUME V NUMBER 5 March/April 1981 The
relevance of Pepper's work for a scholar seeking to understand the dynamic
that informed the politics of China's civil war period cannot be over emphasized.
Not only does Pepper treat us to a most perceptive and brilliant analysis of
what went into making a communist victory possible in 1949, when just four years
earlier the Kuomintang (KMT) had enjoyed the undisputed confidence of almost
every section of Chinese society, but she also provides us with a wealth of
data and documentation on the subject.
The story of KMT rule during the period 1945-46 to
1948-49, both in the cities and the countryside, was, as Pepper records, is a
sorry one. The venality and corruption of its officials gradually alienated
almost every section of the urban and rural population. Government policy
makers of the time also revealed both a lack of will and determination to take
those· hard decisions so necessary for any kind of economic recovery. Instead,
the KMT appeared to have only one obsession for which it was willing to
sacrifice the interests of all - the continuation of the civil war against the
communists. It was perhaps this, more than any thing else, that eventually
forced the intelligentsia in the cities to come to terms with the reality of a
communist alternative. For, the intelligentsia, that most progressive and
advanced section of the population, clung till the very last to the KMT in the
vain hope that some how it would read the writing on the wall and reform
itself. The student community was also not immune from this species of wishful
thinking. As late as 1948, as Pepper notes, a survey conducted amongst students
in the University of Shanghai revealed that whiie a substantial number (72 per
cent) favoured reform of the political system and the creation of a coalition
government, only 3.7 per cent favoured national rule by the Chinese Communist
Party (CCP) alone. Of course this can also be attributed to the fact that most
of them were cut off from the reality that existed in the countryside and were
thus prone to argue that since neither the KMT or the CCP were in a position to
win, the civil war would be a long draw out indecisive affair.
Unlike the KMT, the CCP appeared to possess both the will
and the ability to implement a programme which ... Table of Contents >> |